Skip to content
Email Deliverability Consultants
Login Get Started →
// live benchmark · updated daily

Email Deliverability Benchmark

Daily updated insights into where emails land and why.

Based on thousands of daily tests from our service across industries and providers. All data is aggregated and anonymized.

Last update: June 14, 2026

Real-Time Deliverability Benchmarks

Our benchmarks are updated every 24 hours using aggregated results from the thousands of deliverability tests run through Unspam each day. This ensures you're comparing against current data, not outdated averages.

Data source: spam and inbox-placement tests run through Unspam, aggregated and anonymized across industries and providers.

Choose the Time Period
Loading...
    Jun 14, 2025 - Jun 14, 2026

    Deliverability health score

    // global health score

    Global Deliverability Health Score

    87 / 100
    Excellent
    Global deliverability remains challenging in 2026. Improved SPF/DKIM/BIMI adoption helps, but increased spam filtering and stricter ISP policies have tightened inbox placement.
    Deliverability Score Algorithm Proprietary score combining inbox placement rates (60%), authentication setup (25%), reputation metrics (10%), and technical compliance (5%). 85-100 Excellent 70-84 Good <70 Attention
    // sender authentication

    Sender Authentication & Infrastructure

    SPF Adoption
    90% good

    Strong adoption continues with 10% still lacking basic SPF records.

    DKIM Adoption
    87% good

    Strong adoption continues with 13% still lacking basic DKIM records.

    DMARC Adoption
    58% poor

    Adoption is developing, though 42% have not implemented DMARC yet.

    BIMI Adoption
    1% critical

    Low adoption overall, with 99% missing BIMI entirely.

    Reverse DNS
    98% excellent

    Near-universal adoption with only 2% lacking proper rDNS.

    // domain age
    Inboxed avg 9.2 years
    New domains face stricter scrutiny.
    // domain suffix
    .com 53.38% inbox
    .org 2.61% inbox
    .net 2.54% inbox
    Cheap TLDs face heavy filtering.
    // blacklist hits
    Domain 0.27%
    IP 3%
    Even a single blacklist listing can tank inbox rates.
    // comprehensive check analysis

    Comprehensive Check Analysis (All Unspam.email Test Categories)

    OK status
    82% Pass

    Checks passed successfully

    WARN status
    14% Warn

    Minor issues that could improve

    BAD status
    4% Fail

    Critical issues requiring attention

    // detailed check statistics
    Domain Blacklists
    Domain reputation across major blacklists
    100%
    pass rate
    IP Blacklists
    IP address reputation monitoring
    97%
    pass rate
    SPF Records
    Sender Policy Framework validation
    90%
    pass rate
    DKIM Signatures
    Digital signature authentication
    87%
    pass rate
    DMARC Policies
    Domain-based authentication alignment
    58%
    pass rate
    BIMI Records
    Brand Indicators for Message Identification
    1%
    pass rate
    Reverse DNS
    PTR record configuration
    98%
    pass rate
    List-Unsubscribe Header
    RFC 2369 unsubscribe mechanism
    14%
    pass rate
    HTML Best Practices
    Email HTML structure validation
    29%
    pass rate
    Subject Line Quality
    Subject line spam trigger analysis
    56%
    pass rate
    Broken Links
    Link destination validation
    78%
    pass rate
    Body Content Analysis
    Content spam pattern detection
    89%
    pass rate
    Short URL Usage
    URL shortener service detection
    96%
    pass rate
    Accessibility Standards
    Email accessibility compliance
    84%
    pass rate
    Domain Suffix Reputation
    Top-level domain reputation analysis
    100%
    pass rate
    Domain Age Factor
    Domain registration age verification
    50%
    pass rate
    // industry benchmarks
    90%+ pass rate: Excellent deliverability practices
    75-89% pass rate: Good, with room for improvement
    <75% pass rate: Critical issues need immediate attention
    // spamassassin score distribution
    // score analysis
    0.0 - 1.0
    Excellent
    45%
    of emails
    1.1 - 3.0
    Good
    44%
    of emails
    3.1 - 5.0
    Caution
    8%
    of emails
    5.1 - 10.0
    Poor
    3%
    of emails
    10.0+
    Critical
    0.13%
    of emails
    // spamassassin impact
    Scores <3.0: Generally delivered to inbox
    Scores 3.1-5.0: May be filtered or flagged
    Scores >5.0: High probability of spam folder
    Scores >10.0: Likely blocked completely
    // bimi adoption

    BIMI (Brand Indicators for Message Identification)

    BIMI Record Published
    1% +25% brand recognition

    Domains with valid BIMI DNS records

    VMC Verified Logos
    0.75% +18% open rates

    Verified Mark Certificates with authenticated logos - growing fast

    Logo Display Rate
    1% +32% trust score

    Successful logo displays in supported clients - improved compatibility

    Client Support
    72% Expanding rapidly

    Email clients supporting BIMI display - Apple Mail adoption key

    // bimi industry adoption rates
    Software/Tech
    Technical audience, growing adoption
    9% Low
    Education
    Limited budgets slow VMC adoption
    9% Low
    Media & Publishing
    Brand differentiation is important
    8% Low
    Retail & E-commerce
    Visual branding drives purchases
    7% Low
    Financial Services
    Trust and brand recognition are critical
    7% Low
    Travel & Hospitality
    Strong branding influences booking decisions
    7% Low
    Business Services
    B2B focus, gradual adoption
    6% Low
    Health & Wellness
    Credibility boosts customer confidence
    6% Low
    // bimi benefits
    Brand Recognition: +25%
    Open Rates: +18%
    Trust Score: +32%
    VMC-verified logos show highest impact.
    // client support
    Gmail: Full Support
    Outlook: Partial
    Apple Mail: iOS 16+
    Support expanding rapidly across platforms.
    // implementation
    DNS Setup: Required
    VMC Cost: $1500+/year
    DMARC: p=quarantine+
    Requires strong DMARC policy first.
    // content best practices

    Content & Best Practice Stats

    List-Unsubscribe Compliance
    14% poor

    Essential for user trust and deliverability. Missing headers increase spam complaints, and 86% are not compliant with List-Unsubscribe requirements.

    Broken Links Clean
    78% average

    Even a few malfunctioning links can disrupt campaigns and reduce engagement, with 22% of links being broken.

    No Spammy Words
    89% good

    Frequent triggers: "100% Free", "Urgent", "Act Now".

    Short URLs Used
    96% good

    Short URLs simplify click tracking and analytics, however they may introduce risk by concealing malicious destinations.

    Accessibility Compliance
    84% good

    Missing alt text and poor readability harm user experience and inclusive design. Alt text is missing from 16% of images.

    // subject line patterns
    ALL CAPS 2%
    Emoji 3%
    >60 chars 8%
    // key insight
    Short, clear subjects and proper unsubscribe links are strongly correlated with better inbox placement.

    Methodology and citation

    These benchmarks are aggregated from email deliverability checks run through Unspam over the trailing 12 months and refreshed every 24 hours. Figures reflect senders who tested with Unspam, so they skew toward senders actively diagnosing a deliverability issue and do not represent all email globally.

    Cite this: Unspam Email Deliverability Benchmark, unspam.email/email-deliverability-benchmark (updated June 2026).

    Solutions
    • Email Verifier
    • Inbox Placement
    • Deliverability Statistics
    • Deliverability Monitoring
    • AI Eye-Tracking Heatmap
    • Email Spam Checker API
    • Inbox Placement API
    Free Tools
    • Email Health Check
    • SPF Checker
    • DKIM Checker
    • DMARC Checker
    • BIMI Checker
    • IP Blacklist Checker
    • Domain Blacklist Checker
    • Email Blacklist Checker
    Deliverability Guides
    • Klaviyo
    • Mailchimp
    • SendGrid
    • HubSpot
    • ActiveCampaign
    • Brevo
    • Salesforce
    • Constant Contact
    • Amazon SES
    • All guides
    For your team
    • For Ecommerce
    • For Agencies
    • For SaaS
    • For Cold Outreach
    • For Startups
    • For Newsletters
    • For Developers
    • For Enterprise
    • For Recruiting
    Compare
    • vs GlockApps
    • vs Kickbox
    • vs Mail-Tester
    • vs MailGenius
    • vs MailReach
    • vs Warmy
    • vs MXToolbox
    • vs Folderly
    • vs Validity Everest
    • vs Litmus
    • All comparisons
    Company
    • Pricing
    • Email Deliverability Consultants
    • Academy
    • Articles
    • Help Center
    • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy

    Complete email deliverability solutions, consulting, diagnostic tools, spam evaluation, AI analysis, heatmap insights, and inbox placement.

    All systems normal

    © 2026 Unspam®. All rights reserved. 167 Madison Avenue, Suite 205, New York, NY 10016, United States